|
by heath_harrison
This past week, both The Charleston Gazette and The Bluefield Daily Telegraph ran a guest column by Carl Hubbard, vice president of Heritage Equipment Co in Beckley and co-founder and president of Don Blankenship's now-defunct phony child advocacy organization/smear campaign "And For the Sake of the Kids."
In addition to referring to the "genius" of his former boss, Hubbard offered up the usual tired straw man argument that even a slight review by the EPA of the permit process for mountaintop removal will destroy life in West Virginia.
Of those who do not conform to his short-sighted ideas for West Virginia's future, Hubbard wrote:
Are we, as proud West Virginians, going to stand idly by while a bunch of limp-wristed greenieacs - who, by the way, for the most part don't even live here - try to shut down our state's biggest industry? If we let these people go unchecked, it won't be long until everything we love is gone: hunting, fishing, racing, working, everything.
Racing?
I'm a little disappointed that folks in the environmental movement haven't let me in on their master plan to take away your NASCAR, but I'm always out of the loop on these kinds of things.
And do we even need to point out the effect that MTR has on hunting and fishing?
But "limp-wristed?"
Is this really what Blankenship and his allies have come to?
Reducing the discussion to pre-adolescent gay-baiting?
It appears the Telegraph changed 'limp-wristed greenieacs' to "others' when they ran the piece, but The Gazette ran the column with the line intact.
It's a safe bet to say the Gazette would have rejected Hubbard's piece had he used racially-insensitive or anti-semitic language to demean opponents. But, as often is the case, derogatory terms regarding homosexuals are still considered acceptable dialogue in many places.
The Gazette has a right to print whatever they want, but it would be nice if they try to have a little dignity in determining who gets a guest column.
This whole matter leaves me curious as to what the standards are.
Maybe the Gazette editors could provide us with a list of what prejudices and stupidity a person needs to invoke to be granted a forum for their views in newsprint. |